On Thu, 16 Aug 2012 13:29:50 -0700 Diego Elio Pettenò <[email protected]> wrote:
> On 16/08/2012 13:19, Michał Górny wrote:
> > eutils.eclass | 37 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>
> I would say "no", and let's queue this for the next EAPI.
>
> The reason being we have everything ${foo}into {new,do}${foo},
> provided by EAPI and utils as well, why should foo=ins be different
> now?
I'd be happy to see that in a new EAPI but please note that a lot
of eclasses inlines that thing right now.
We can remove it from eutils when it gets into EAPI (i.e. make
conditional to older EAPIs). This will keep things both usable
and clean.
--
Best regards,
Michał Górny
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
