On 25/08/2012 13:09, Michał Górny wrote:
> That's not PMS-compliant, sir.

But it's terribly useful. (I have expressed before my contempt for PMS,
I'm sure.)

I'm not expecting the ebuild to die, just to send a warning so that the
developer knows when they fail to meet non-obvious requirements.

-- 
Diego Elio Pettenò — Flameeyes
[email protected]http://blog.flameeyes.eu/

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Reply via email to