On Wed, 29 Aug 2012 15:17:48 -0700 Diego Elio Pettenò <[email protected]> wrote:
> On 29/08/2012 15:16, Michał Górny wrote: > >>> > > Also, some people are probably going to try to get some > >>> > > pkgconf support directly into gcc, in form of '-something > >>> > > libfoo' to make it grab everything magically, I think. > >> > > >> > You have a future as a comedian. > > Sir, you are going too far. > > I'm just saying that relying on something like that is a ludicrous > notion. > > Okay so somebody might actually try to do that, not going to debate > that — people have been out of their mind before. > > But developers actually relying on it? I find it very hard, as that > basically means you're introducing build systems that only ever work > on a theoretical GCC 4.8 _and nothing else_. > > So can you see what makes me laugh in your statement? So you haven't seen GNU Makefiles, do you? -- Best regards, Michał Górny
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
