-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256

On 31/08/12 10:56 AM, Alexis Ballier wrote:
> Michał Górny <mgo...@gentoo.org> wrote:
>> 
>> I believe that the more important direction here is to make 
>> development *easier*, not harder. Adding the same DEPENDs over
>> and over again to every single package is at least frustrating.
>> Similarly frustrating would be if those 'reduced systems' had to
>> rebuild gcc every time they wanted to compile something... oh
>> wait, they would have to bootstrap it every time.
>> 
> 
> you would achieve it better by adding pkgconfig to DEPEND in 
> eutils.eclass than putting it in @system since in the latter case
> it would also be a RDEPEND of everything basically
> 

And realistically that's where the DEPEND should be anyways, IMO --
appended by the eclass where the function is that uses it.  If this
means prune_libtool_files() gets separated out of eutils and put in
its own eclass (so that all the eutils inheritors don't suddenly need
virtual/pkgconfig unnecessarily), then so be it.

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (GNU/Linux)

iF4EAREIAAYFAlBA0rMACgkQ2ugaI38ACPB8dgD8CsXPJvPDjI3111dXT/z+gGUM
q8wTmMYqR2zVJasZMJQA/25de5bSofnwk4fXlCwPEFJ3Tu9rtCFRAx+q95oGFkad
=GWHe
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Reply via email to