On Fri, 7 Sep 2012 16:07:54 +0100 Ciaran McCreesh <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Fri, 7 Sep 2012 17:02:57 +0200 > Michał Górny <[email protected]> wrote: > > > The problem is that you're arguing against a proposal that doesn't > > > exist except in your head. If you'd like to read and understand > > > the proposal being made, which starts with understanding the bits > > > marked clearly with stars, and then once you've understood it, > > > rethink and present any issues you find with that proposal then > > > we might have something to discuss. > > > > Renaming and/or reordering something doesn't change its > > implications. It's just 'main disadvantage' vs 'side disadvantage'. > > Well no. You've been arguing against some mysterious proposal that > doesn't exist that you think is about replacing lots of variables with > one variable. That's not what DEPENDENCIES is, and now that you've got > a proper write-up, you can try reading it, understanding it and then > seeing if you have any objections to what's actually being proposed. Ah, I forgot how the goals change *everything*. Because it's good to kill hundreds of people for the good reasons. -- Best regards, Michał Górny
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
