On Fri, 7 Sep 2012 20:13:19 +0100 Ciaran McCreesh <ciaran.mccre...@googlemail.com> wrote:
> On Fri, 7 Sep 2012 21:11:22 +0200 > Michał Górny <mgo...@gentoo.org> wrote: > > On Fri, 7 Sep 2012 19:52:05 +0100 > > Ciaran McCreesh <ciaran.mccre...@googlemail.com> wrote: > > > On Fri, 7 Sep 2012 20:46:48 +0200 > > > Michał Górny <mgo...@gentoo.org> wrote: > > > > Now, let me remind you because you probably fail to know the > > > > world outside your dreamworld: > > > > > > > > (with HDEPEND/DEPEND) generally mean that we would need to > > > > s/DEPEND/HDEPEND/ for the vast majority of ebuilds (ie all the > > > > trivial ones)? > > > > > > > > That does effectively refer to the common depends as well. You > > > > know, in the real world where there is no magical variables > > > > which do miracles behind your back. > > > > > > Uhm, no, it doesn't. Things in both DEPEND and RDEPEND are an > > > *entirely* different case when it comes to destinations, since > > > RDEPEND goes to ROOT. > > > > And? RDEPEND isn't required to be merged before building the > > package. > > I repeat: "things in both DEPEND and RDEPEND". > > I also repeat: HDEPEND is relevant only to things that are in DEPEND > and not RDEPEND. So... what is your issue in here, sir? -- Best regards, Michał Górny
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
