On Sunday 16 September 2012 11:01:00 Alexis Ballier wrote: > also, you are missing some bug # for the 'broken deps' part. packages > that have gained broken deps when the profile was marked 'dev', or that > you committed with your profile.desc locally modified, do not count and > are your fault actually...
wrong. if i'm version bumping a package and i see broken amd64-fbsd deps, that is not my problem. sounds like i'll simply de-keyword it in the future and let someone else pick up the pieces. do a repoman on the tree. there are multiple packages coming back right now with broken amd64-fbsd deps. -mike
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
