El lun, 17-09-2012 a las 14:47 +0300, Samuli Suominen escribió: > On 17/09/12 12:03, Peter Stuge wrote: > > Pacho Ramos wrote: > >>>>>> # Pacho Ramos <[email protected]> (16 Sep 2012) > >>>>>> # Upstream keeps inactive for ages and, then, it has broke again > >>>>>> # now with gnutls-3 (#421385). Removal in a month. > >>>>>> net-im/jabberd > >>>>> > >>>>> What about the 1.4 version? It depends on openssl, so maybe it > >>>>> doesn't have the gnutls issue. > >> > >> I really doubt even oldest 1.4 version will have less unresolved bugs > >> than current (already unmaintained and buggy) 1.6.x versions > > > > Should you check that, before removing it? > > That would be a job for the maintainer of the package, not member of the > treecleaners... > > -Samuli > >
You also would need to provide a fix for existing bug, not keep it as-is forever
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
