On Tue, 18 Sep 2012 22:08:43 +0100 Ciaran McCreesh <ciaran.mccre...@googlemail.com> wrote:
> On Tue, 18 Sep 2012 23:06:06 +0200 > Michał Górny <mgo...@gentoo.org> wrote: > > But didn't we already point out that we can't have them in RDEPEND > > since they introduce conflicts? > > You are missing a basic and important part of how dependency > resolution works: currently, cycles consisting purely of RDEPENDs are > ignorable. So, what do we lose? If PDEP comes 'ASAP' officially, I believe that we actually gain RDEPs which can be actually trusted. -- Best regards, Michał Górny
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
