On 18/09/2012 16:50, Gilles Dartiguelongue wrote: > Let me just say that as a user, concerning this technology aggregate, I > really don't care, it has to "just work" :). Now if you gather enough > momentum to split this flag and make other people on this list agree > with you, I'll be just fine with it :)
I'd be positive to splitting them. Especially because for instance in an office you might care about port forwarding but won't care about DLNA. Speaking of which, renaming (where applicable) upnp to dlna might be more user friendly since usually you have the feature _advertised_ as DLNA, not as UPnP! -- Diego Elio Pettenò — Flameeyes [email protected] — http://blog.flameeyes.eu/
