On Wed, Sep 26, 2012 at 08:58:54AM +0200, Micha?? G??rny wrote: > On Sun, 16 Sep 2012 06:52:11 -0700 > Brian Harring <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Keeping it short and quick, a basic glep has been written for what I'm > > proposing for DEPENDENCIES enhancement. > > > > The live version of the doc is available at > > http://dev.gentoo.org/~ferringb/unified-dependencies/extensible_dependencies.html > > > > One more question -- are we going to keep 'foo,bar?' syntax as > a special case applying only to dependency atoms or are we going to > extend it to USE flags?
Note that's dep:foo,bar; not a bare "allow any use flags to be OR'd together". In light of the fact it *is* just an expansion hack, the usage is semi limited although there are scenarios for it; arches, namely (if amd64 or x86, use this, if mips, that, etc). I have no preference either way; extending it outside of dep isn't necessary if people hate it, although as said, there are some potential uses for it. That said, if we were to start using it, the ',' as an 'or' operator mildly sucks; dep:build|run also sucks (hard to read), and dep:build+run, to me at least, implies 'and'. And yep, bikeshedding potential there. ~harrin
