-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA256 On 30/09/12 05:53 PM, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: > On Sun, 30 Sep 2012 14:42:14 -0700 Brian Harring > <ferri...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> The second is that it starts the conceptual shift from "cat/pkg >>> is a build dep, and cat/pkg is a run dep" to "cat/pkg is a dep >>> that is required for build and run". >> >> Fairly weak argument at best; you're claiming that via labels, >> "contextually they know it's these deps" in comparison to via >> dep:build "contextually they know it's exposed only in build". >> >> Same difference. > > It's rather a big deal now that we have := dependencies. >
So you would using your labels syntax, specify an atom with a := dep using certain labels and the same atom without ':=' on other labels? I don't quite follow what you're getting at here as to how this is a big deal.. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (GNU/Linux) iF4EAREIAAYFAlBrKYUACgkQ2ugaI38ACPAMJAD9FzCH4ifbkanbC17w2KGjMHP7 G4qBrJ9v2dd7sHV338EA/iK/J+NZosc+M7wefJ8J6fU4mVczlM4WiOkCNVsTSO6w =Io2B -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
