On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 12:00:43PM +0200, Dirkjan Ochtman wrote: > On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 11:15 AM, Brian Harring <[email protected]> wrote: > > Either way, thoughts? > > It looks like you haven't looked at the python-r1 effort. That means > you probably also aren't subscribed to the gentoo-python mailing list. > I suggest you do both first. :)
Yeah, I'm not on the ML- as for the eclass, I read the source; nothing in there in re: to wrappers currently. Only thread I see that is relevant is http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.gentoo.python/11 ; roughly executable wrapper, just what I'm spelling out here is the exact mechanism's of how to do it. Re: python-r1; frankly... if folks are fine w/ the wrapper, I don't want it delayed waiting on python-r1 (or only used there). As I laid out, what I'm proposing can be dropped in *now* for existing python eclass- basically moves that logic out of it and into eselect-python. It'll be faster/saner to maintain, less code in python eclass, and reusable going forward for the new attempts; plus I'm willing to do it (meaning it'll get done in the next week or two). That said; +1 or -1, or some where in between? ~harring
