On 31/10/12 17:09, Michał Górny wrote:
On Wed, 31 Oct 2012 11:57:49 -0300
Alexis Ballier <[email protected]> wrote:
On Tue, 30 Oct 2012 21:18:02 +0100
Michał Górny <[email protected]> wrote:
[...]
Don't even try to touch any of my eclasses without prior asking.
A bit aggressive but its rather obvious that this is the norm not the
exception, meaning the argument 'I do not want to diverge from
$other eclass' is moot.
It's aggressive because Samuli has a history of touching (and sometimes
breaking) other people's packages without even asking or pinging that
he did that, and believing he's above all the rules here.
You don't know me clearly, that's definately the opposite of what I'm
doing and intending to do, walking the fine line and bothering people
only when something real changes...
Breaking? Hardly, since I never commit untested code, and the exceptions
I've fixed myself usually very quickly as I'm watching incoming bugs,
forums, and more
I'm being cooperative with you and keeping udev.eclass with
systemd.eclass sort of 'in sync' due to the nature of both
packages being from the same tarball. What more do you want? Seriously.
