El dom, 18-11-2012 a las 00:27 -0800, Greg KH escribió: > On Sun, Nov 18, 2012 at 12:19:21AM -0800, Greg KH wrote: > > On Sun, Nov 18, 2012 at 03:10:08AM -0500, Richard Yao wrote: > > > You are the one claiming that this is our official fork. None of us are. > > > > It's on the Gentoo github site, and it has the Gentoo Foundation > > copyright all over all of the files in one of the branches, reviewed by > > you. > > > > I think I would be pretty foolish if I somehow thought it was _not_ an > > official fork :) > > Oh, and the README file says it is a Gentoo project: > This is a Gentoo sponsored project and testing is currently > being done with openrc. However, we aim to be distro neutral > and welcome contribution from others using a variety of system > initializations. We also aim towards POSIX compliance. > > So why would I think otherwise? > > thanks, > > greg k-h > >
Looks like we think different about what a "Gentoo project" means, lets read: http://devmanual.gentoo.org/general-concepts/herds-and-projects/index.html That would explain why both, eudev and systemd "Gentoo projects" can coexist: http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/base/systemd/index.xml
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
