>>>>> On Mon, 17 Dec 2012, William Hubbs wrote:
> This all started with the April 2012 council meeting when it was
> pushed through that separate /usr without an initramfs is a
> supported configuration, so yes, the previous council started this
> issue.
Sorry, but that's not an accurate account of what the council has
decided on. What we voted on in the April 2012 meeting was this:
<ulm> The question is: "Decide on whether a separate /usr is still
a supported configuration."
And later in the same meeting (yes, I know it's probably not enough
context, so read the full log [1]):
<ulm> _AxS_: we should make sure that there's reasonable
documentation about setting up an initramfs though
<_AxS_> ulm: oh yes -- i was figuring the solution on how to
support separate /usr with new udev would be tabled at the
mext meeting (if necessary)
<Chainsaw> _AxS_: I would recommend raising the implementation
details for next meeting, yes.
[...]
<dberkholz> the implementation details are my concern, but that's
not the vote.
<ulm> o.k., that's 5 yes 1 no then
Ulrich
[1] <http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/council/meeting-logs/20120403.txt>
