[gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-dev-announce] Lastrites: media-sound/logitechmediaserver-bin, net-dialup/misdn, net-dialup/misdnuser, net-misc/asterisk-chan_misdn, www-apache/mod_authn_pam, www-apache/mod_cplusplus, net-dialup/ltmodem, =dev-libs/gmime-2.2.27-r1, www-apache/mod_spin, www-apache/mod_python, dev-dotnet/galago-sharp, sys-apps/galago-daemon, dev-libs/libgalago, www-apache/mod_transform, dev-util/monodevelop-java, dev-util/monodevelop-python, dev-util/monodevelop-vala, media-libs/libdlna, media-video/ushare, app-admin/flexlm, net-misc/cisco-vpnclient-3des, app-emulation/systemsim-cell, sys-block/gcloop, games-roguelike/noegnud-data, games-roguelike/noegnud-nethack, games-roguelike/noegnud-slashem

[Pacho Ramos]

El mié, 26-12-2012 a las 17:14 +0000, Markos Chandras escribió:
> 
> On Dec 25, 2012 8:33 PM, "Pacho Ramos" <pa...@gentoo.org> wrote:
> >
> >
> > # Pacho Ramos <pa...@gentoo.org> (25 Dec 2012)
> > # Fails to build with libav-9 (#443238). Removal in a month.
> > media-libs/libdlna
> > media-video/ushare
> >
> This is not a valid reason to remove it. I use it every day. Please
> remove the masking. You should have contacted me first as I think I am
> on metadata (haven't checked yet)
> 
> 

You were contacted at:
https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=443238#c1

But no problem with dropping the mask... the only doubt, should we keep
libdlna too or drop optional ushare support for it?

signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part