-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA256 On 30/12/12 12:39, Diego Elio Pettenò wrote: > On 30/12/2012 04:03, Mike Gilbert wrote: >> That would be much more effective than a policy that may be >> (accidentally) ignored. > > +1 +1 from me as well. A much simpler and reliable way of achieving what I want.
- -- Alexander alexan...@plaimi.net http://plaimi.net/~alexander -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iF4EAREIAAYFAlDgKJ8ACgkQRtClrXBQc7XRqgEAn4IGnXvevFHkfidz6BYwR9lt ZM/s9E1s7pRcbq92RpUA/3DoaKg6qzEKV0VgjVDC9czRfP1eZDU/RYJmXJbpaoqC =drvi -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
