El jue, 11-10-2012 a las 08:13 +0200, Pacho Ramos escribió:
> El mié, 10-10-2012 a las 20:11 -0400, Jesus Rivero (Neurogeek) escribió:
> > On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 5:53 PM, Chí-Thanh Christopher Nguyễn
> > <chith...@gentoo.org> wrote:
> > > Pacho Ramos schrieb:
> > >>>>>> I am noticing for a long time that bugs related with ekiga,
> > >>>>>> opal, yate... are completely unattended by voip team for
> > >>>>>> years. If nobody from that team is willing to maintain
> > >>>>>> them, please move them to maintainer-needed to, at least,
> > >>>>>> reflect reality.
> > >
> > >> Any news here? I can move that packages to maintainer-needed if you
> > >> send me the list of packages you don't want to maintain. Also,
> > >> maybe telepathy stuff could be moved to its own herd (that is
> > >> basically gnome team + tester... or maybe tester could join gnome
> > >> team ;))
> > >
> > > There is now one proxy maintainer for a couple of packages, he is
> > > currently waiting for voip overlay access in bug 437538. He will take
> > > care of linphone and related packages (see bug 399735 and its
> > > dependencies).
> > >
> > > Regarding the packages that can be moved to maintainer-needed: I think
> > > a good heuristic is if the package has several open bugs with no
> > > maintainer reaction, and hasn't been touched by anyone from voip herd
> > > in over a year. This would include the ekiga, opal and yate packages
> > > mentioned above.
> > >
> > I'd gladly take maintainership of opal and ekiga, if nobody wants them.
> > 
> > Cheers,
> > 
> 
> Would be nice as they need a lot of bumps and pending work 
> 

Looks like finally you added yourself to metadata but with instructions
to bug-wranglers to CC you and assign to herd. I would like to confirm
this way of assigning things with both as voip herd people didn't touch
ekiga related packages and, also, would be better to clarify things
before me going to their bugs and assigning them properly to comply
current metadatas (as I have seen some ekiga bugs still only assigned to
voip herd without you CCed)

Thanks

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Reply via email to