-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 02/02/2013 12:13 PM, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: > On Sat, 02 Feb 2013 12:06:39 +0100 hasufell <hasuf...@gentoo.org> > wrote: >> From a little discussion in this bug >> https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=454600#c11 it seems that >> it's not entirely sure what bash version can be assumed. >> >> PMS says, that I have to assume 3.2 or later >> https://dev.gentoo.org/~ulm/pms/head/pms.html#x1-620006 >> >> But there is no stable bash version from 3.2 to 4.1 portage >> itself depends on >=app-shells/bash-4.2_p37 > > It's irrelevant what Portage depends upon, since this is about the > upgrade path. PMS specifies what the Council voted upon last time > this came up. >
Yeah, from what I read and after checking council logs I don't see any vote/discussion that would change this requirement. for reference: https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=431340 I will push for allowing >=bash-4.0 in EAPI=6. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/ iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJRDP7XAAoJEFpvPKfnPDWzwykH/joNViLyZlVVqFUSM9w+FKfs i31Wegdo3WM7rJeeChyJW0JvI5e8VFzvkvLB116Z9VENFGMedEKLygtvTKYJRMt1 KmHdb5xmKf+v048u9YiWfAaseYOXlrnm3O6KoEVIGRB4LnqIhMOkmAu8MU6bTje7 ly7kaIEdga0E0OiCGKz7d3sXkVBnNBdjeUDdZfSYsQcEqE17lt1enuWiCfOn3dT6 BjCQvqN8pGU2t4CcAnWZuBUxefIv57/sC0qbzLiRvzPzeofc7hVcW7VeZDh4gi5j k27zGnJUlQKj2M3t3qUAg46Za1kEjlwpJbjvb2Dc3RoYR63gkFxg7nJuMyKZW4Y= =LgxJ -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
