-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA256 On 06/02/13 09:53 AM, Markos Chandras wrote: > On 6 February 2013 14:18, Ian Stakenvicius <a...@gentoo.org> wrote: >> >> So, *my* systems do have /var/run -> /run , which means at some >> point the /run migration did happen and compatibility symlinks >> were created. If hwoarang's systems don't have this, there must >> be an issue somewhere. >> > > My system is a brand new ~testing installation with a > stage3-amd64-20130110.tar.bz2. I am not sure who is responsible > for creating this symlink. I see the symlink is present on that > stage3 tarball so somehow it must have been removed from my system. > Even if it was a user error, then shouldn't there be a mechanism of > recreating it on every boot if it's gone missing? At least until > all init scripts migrate to /run. >
..there was a discussion a week or two back about portage cleaning up symlinks, or something that needs to be done to keep portage warning about symlinks, or something. Anyways, I'm wondering if a change was made related to that and for whatever reason portage is now cleaning /var/run -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (GNU/Linux) iF4EAREIAAYFAlEScMgACgkQ2ugaI38ACPAl7wEAj/n6Euiq/8gNn2tb8LjdJB7E 07yk78xCMZJudAHI/NEA/jHR5BoQIHZu2Tm5PRBN3BiK3Fe1miak3Z4UGVuSRudx =j+bI -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
