On 14 February 2013 16:37, Florian Philipp <li...@binarywings.net> wrote: > Am 14.02.2013 17:30, schrieb Markos Chandras: >> On 14 February 2013 15:57, Ian Stakenvicius <a...@gentoo.org> wrote: >> On 14/02/13 10:33 AM, George Shapovalov wrote: >>>>> On Thursday 14 February 2013 21:03:55 Ben de Groot wrote: >>>>>> On 14 February 2013 20:25, George Shapovalov <geo...@gentoo.org> >>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>> Um, what about the sunset overlay? IIRC, it was used/intended >>>>>>> primarily for this purpose. Is it still alive? (haven't heard >>>>>>> it mentioned in a while and layman seems to list onyl sunrise) >>>>>> >>>>>> You probably mean kde-sunset, which is specifically for >>>>>> Qt3/KDE3. But I guess we could consider merging kde-sunset with >>>>>> graveyard. >>>>> Nope, plain sunset. At the time when the sunrise overlay was making >>>>> a lot of noise (some 5 years ago?) there was a talk about sunset >>>>> one. I don't remember details any more and it is absent from >>>>> layman, so it could have been just talk without anything following >>>>> it.. >>>>> >>>>> >> >> I remember it too (and I think i mentioned it a couple of weeks ago). >> I believe the sunset overlay was deprecated in favour of the attic >> being made more easily available (also probably because no dev's had >> time to maintain/administer it) >> >> >>> >> >> Last time I checked, the sunrise overlay was very much alive. It's >> purpose is not to store old ebuilds (per se). It keeps high-quality >> (because they are reviewed by devs and users before they appear in the >> main branch) ebuilds that are not in portage tree. I think that the >> sunrise devs would reject ebuilds that got removed from tree for >> obvious reasons (dead upstream, broken etc etc) >> > > Read again. It's sunset, not sunrise. :-) >
Oops indeed :-/ -- Regards, Markos Chandras - Gentoo Linux Developer http://dev.gentoo.org/~hwoarang
