On Thu, 28 Feb 2013 02:06:25 +0100 hasufell <hasuf...@gentoo.org> wrote:
> On 02/24/2013 11:39 PM, Samuli Suominen wrote: > > On 24/02/13 02:34, hasufell wrote: > >> Some people seem to feel uncomfortable with autotools-multilib, because > >> it depends on autotools-utils. > >> > >> Instead of arguing whether it makes sense or not I'd propose a similar > >> autotools related eclass. > >> > >> I also attach an example conversion of media-libs/libexif (the > >> maintainer wants to keep the changes minimal). > >> Effectively I am only (almost) changing the function names and not the > >> ebuild code. > > > > looks good, seems exactly what I wanted > > > >> Feel free to propose a different eclass name. > > > > whatever it will be, please make it shorter, like 'multiabi' maybe > > > > I cleaned up some things. > > 1) eclass renamed to multilib-minimal.eclass You didn't like multilib-wrapper? > 4) Introduced a DISABLE_MULTILIB variable for use of portage-multilib, > which will disable all multilib related stuff. I am not sure if that's > what they want, but I heard something like that. > Tommy should comment on this. Setting that variable would invalidate metadata cache. -- Best regards, Michał Górny
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
