On Sun, 03 Mar 2013 22:39:42 +0100 Thomas Sachau <[email protected]> wrote: > The wrapper is already in a seperate package [1], the currently active > and tested version (1.0) is in bash, also there is a (currently > masked) version 2.0 written by binki in C doing the same natively. So > you even have a choice in what to use. :-)
Good and not so good: We don't really have a choice, for portability we need a C version otherwise shebangs are broken with older linux kernels and non-linux platforms. ( Do you remember the python-wrapper mess? :) ) It'd be nice to have a well tested C version. Alexis.
