Am Sonntag, 24. März 2013, 10:05:54 schrieb Duncan: > Thus definitely ++. > > The one big concern I have is that in our approach to the srcd folks we > make clear we're *NOT* attempting to take over their project. That's the > sensitivity I see with the co-branded idea. I'd actually prefer that we > NOT do a co-branded thing, unless the srcd folks suggest it (this assumes > yngwin's not srcd upstream and thus did indeed just make that offer, I > don't know), and simply cooperate a bit more with them, filing bugs (and > as their upstream fixing them in gentoo where possible), helping to fix > the ppp networking config issues already mentioned, etc, while simply > using their releases as they are. If we want to point out that they're a > gentoo-based project that we happily endorse in our handbook links to > them, great, but I'm afraid a co-branded suggestion from our side might > come across as an attempt to take over, and that'd benefit absolutely no > one!
+1 They are doing a great job, and we should acknowledge that, talk to them but not interfere. First of all this is a decision of our own policy. (Do we want to officially recommend a third-party tool in our documentation?) -- Andreas K. Huettel Gentoo Linux developer dilfri...@gentoo.org http://www.akhuettel.de/
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
