Le mardi 02 avril 2013 à 09:43 +0200, Michał Górny a écrit : > On Tue, 2 Apr 2013 00:43:31 +0200 > "Andreas K. Huettel" <dilfri...@gentoo.org> wrote: > > > Am Dienstag, 2. April 2013, 00:27:59 schrieb Chí-Thanh Christopher Nguyễn: > > > > I would like to suggest unifying use-flag usage, and use "zeroconf" > > > > anywhere. > > > > > > Sounds good. Do you think the same should apply to non-mDNS/DNS-SD based > > > zeroconf like UPnP/SSDP? > > > > No idea to be honest... :| opinions? > > The flags should be practical. I have no use for DNS-SD and other > magical junk, yet use UPnP/IGD for port forwarding. The flags should > let me just enable just that without pulling all other possible > variants I won't use. > > That said, USE=upnp was cleaned up a while ago. I don't think it should > be integrated with zeroconf.
Yeah I don't think it should be merged into zeroconf even though it shares some of its technical base. Imho, zeroconf == dnssd/mdns & ipv4ll and upnp/upnp-av are as described in use.desc -- Gilles Dartiguelongue <e...@gentoo.org> Gentoo
