-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA512 On Sun, 14 Apr 2013 16:14:57 +0200 hasufell <hasuf...@gentoo.org> wrote:
> On 04/13/2013 11:23 PM, Michał Górny wrote: > > Your thoughts? > > > > Sounds ok, but how will the transition happen exactly? Will the > behavior just change for new EAPIs or for all? If for all, who will do > the tinderbox run? I am fine with whatever suits people. New EAPI would be simpler for ebuilds but harder for eclasses (which will have to support both cases). Additionally, there will be the increased risk that thoughtless EAPI switch will silently trigger failure. Retroactive change has the benefit that most of the current uses become valid and all ebuilds start to work correctly the moment we finish it. Noticeably, the transition will occur with a portage upgrade so any testing can be done through p.masking a single package. That said, the tinderbox run would probably end up being community effort in an --emptytree @world update. - -- Best regards, Michał Górny -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (GNU/Linux) iQJ8BAEBCgBmBQJRasTgXxSAAAAAAC4AKGlzc3Vlci1mcHJAbm90YXRpb25zLm9w ZW5wZ3AuZmlmdGhob3JzZW1hbi5uZXQ1RUJGMjBGOTk2RkIzQzIyQ0M2RkNBNDBC QUJGMUQ1RkY4QzgxMTBBAAoJELq/HV/4yBEK0XkQAJkvkv86axzdMJyr7YtUm7w/ ESqLlS5mhqw66Q8Su6n1Rj8d0cfSd8KD9gbu0GdXOyrJ54HpxD5GrAByEjoE+guc 3/cBb1WIYCq30XZbGkBv2uJL92ysKukSaqbfTd+KimFvzc3okd7W0R+5Matiq6BZ KktZZ+vMPXmVmbdnm7zoHqvvEB2rsQy/xwpNj3hXNheLdtvZ1oahAQoiCRi743tD wViY+sCsnn4plsWOLpTibWpOwQD2Qn8sLoaC/exvVNsT7EkEX6REpkw0/V3uz566 jIXv92lcKpTGJdROBAMfhJ5dp8fsQlhJExzlIXPIuxkn4fs4dgKzlHNJ3M78xxGj 3Tt/QeAptEiCWWPMbxZW3yDGiMcGIo2faR2gPOotplBuq7F9KdSedYCw//WXfD9V c5MjslDZCezFLYBhCK7JBILXsavSoAhkRXgjVREcquJeGUaZpkguSGDripZgFwWy 9N4buJ5WOscHT8foVgMNm9SxC565SgmbU6BKboSK1nJMNTwvaaLaJTIfuQvldbVF HLMDYh13N66XJLZfLyy8jnR6HaYfSNTTUndu+n0a+nFkFA4vGYh9B135ikiR4d+N DxO9KUnjuqTYiup8PAUsdfek62OJuFBMkN9biZlIy5ZahEixOPRQNquX36xze68b z1EmfdaF7bjB7H7tHy1p =CftZ -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
