El jue, 02-05-2013 a las 15:54 +0200, hasufell escribió: > On 05/02/2013 03:40 PM, Pacho Ramos wrote: > > El jue, 02-05-2013 a las 14:34 +0200, hasufell escribió: > >> On 05/02/2013 12:41 PM, Pacho Ramos wrote: > >>> gnome-games was splitted in separate packages per game and, then, we > >>> need an eclass to also set proper settings inherited from gnome2 and > >>> games eclasses. This should also solve: > >>> https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=432848 > >>> > >>> eclass and ebuild (games-puzzle/five-or-more) to try attached > >>> > >> > >> This does not honour GAMES_DATADIR afais. > > > > They cannot honor it since installing all stuff under /usr/share/games > > will lead to them even failing to start (I tried it before). > > > > Why? > > It's a common problem that people hardcode data dir destination in their > source files, assuming that people only want to install into /usr/share. > That is simply a bug and needs to be fixed in the package (it also means > it will probably fail for /usr/local and many other usecases, so this is > not even a gentoo specific bug). > > You cannot fix that on eclass level and it is not a reason to drop > supporting GAMES_DATADIR variable. That is inconsistent and does not > make sense. You would even get mixed permissions unless you fix that up too. >
I don't understand why games team makes all this prefix work, isn't changing permissions of installed files enough? I doubt if upstream will be ok with installing schemas/translations/gtk-doc stuff under this prefix :/ > >> > >> "prepgamesdirs" is missing completely too. > >> > >> So those games will not be compliant with the games.eclass standard. > >> > > > > In games.eclass I see you have prepgamesdirs but don't call it on any > > exported phase from games.eclass :-/, how are other games calling it? > > > > > > You call it explicitly. > In src_install, no?
