-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 05/04/2013 06:52 AM, Ryan Hill wrote: > On Fri, 3 May 2013 16:41:33 +0200 Jeroen Roovers <j...@gentoo.org> > wrote: > >> On Fri, 03 May 2013 16:15:35 +0200 hasufell <hasuf...@gentoo.org> >> wrote: > >>> We already get QA warnings for severe compiler warnings with a >>> note that it should be reported upstream. > >> But not all of them. > > I'm not sure what these warnings accomplish really. They're nice > to see if you're trying to debug something, but in that case you're > probably already looking through the log. I don't think anyone > actually reports them upstream, and if they do, if upstream > actually finds them useful. I think they're just noise most of the > time (and if I learned anything from the recent thread about > displaying messages only on first install it's that people think we > already output too much noise). Do others find them useful? > >
I report them for my packages, but often upstream does not care. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/ iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJRhOZqAAoJEFpvPKfnPDWziX8IAIUlHotHvIbYnpAImogN3Kdd f+NJ7xA5f+bFzoSWU5Oan099QNDltSk/a3DJUJp91blUD2l9kEhOTuBACw2WKlYu Shf4GGGWA7VFj01N6oZkefBRmlZbCHaizSFQKFelnNaJWOCs7hD3dJJZ9hD25Afy nDM2PLg+M5n0u31AuXTYoVuAB2Af9g6ElV6uTMmAjH+SBKPRBKUENEgUVmHxQBsE JWgy1T3IjHiOBvXi4PP4WzCMqysLyzEJH0nIju1VeMrWZ2hqXbu6xMhrwgsoylKT 2QvqH6qr106x43dMYZvEpIl3VnIXNgmGyWHTi8J6q8o8XIvpPib6MEhg2S5PGJA= =i5sL -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----