-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On 05/04/2013 06:52 AM, Ryan Hill wrote:
> On Fri, 3 May 2013 16:41:33 +0200 Jeroen Roovers <j...@gentoo.org>
> wrote:
> 
>> On Fri, 03 May 2013 16:15:35 +0200 hasufell <hasuf...@gentoo.org>
>> wrote:
> 
>>> We already get QA warnings for severe compiler warnings with a
>>> note that it should be reported upstream.
> 
>> But not all of them.
> 
> I'm not sure what these warnings accomplish really.  They're nice
> to see if you're trying to debug something, but in that case you're
> probably already looking through the log.  I don't think anyone
> actually reports them upstream, and if they do, if upstream
> actually finds them useful.  I think they're just noise most of the
> time (and if I learned anything from the recent thread about 
> displaying messages only on first install it's that people think we
> already output too much noise).  Do others find them useful?
> 
> 

I report them for my packages, but often upstream does not care.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/

iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJRhOZqAAoJEFpvPKfnPDWziX8IAIUlHotHvIbYnpAImogN3Kdd
f+NJ7xA5f+bFzoSWU5Oan099QNDltSk/a3DJUJp91blUD2l9kEhOTuBACw2WKlYu
Shf4GGGWA7VFj01N6oZkefBRmlZbCHaizSFQKFelnNaJWOCs7hD3dJJZ9hD25Afy
nDM2PLg+M5n0u31AuXTYoVuAB2Af9g6ElV6uTMmAjH+SBKPRBKUENEgUVmHxQBsE
JWgy1T3IjHiOBvXi4PP4WzCMqysLyzEJH0nIju1VeMrWZ2hqXbu6xMhrwgsoylKT
2QvqH6qr106x43dMYZvEpIl3VnIXNgmGyWHTi8J6q8o8XIvpPib6MEhg2S5PGJA=
=i5sL
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Reply via email to