>>>>> On Thu, 13 Jun 2013, Samuli Suominen wrote: > On 13/06/13 07:58, Michał Górny wrote: >> Dnia 2013-06-13, o godz. 01:22:11 Samuli Suominen >> <[email protected]> napisał(a): >> >>> what $subject says, >>> >>> "add support for pkg-config for migration to the new upstream >>> defined bash-completion directories (prereq for bug 472938)" >>> >>> http://bugs.gentoo.org/472938 >>> >>> ie. the pkg-config file shipped *now* in portage is a hack from me >>> to postpone this >>> >>> pretty tired so more eyes is cool ;) >> >> You mean http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.gentoo.devel/85258 ? >> >> I think you've got to convince ulm in the first place.
> His concerns was actually already covered by the first post and the > linked bug: > This is required for smooth migration path from old to new > directories. Back when the old thread happened, there was only one > possible value for completions dir, now there is two. And nothing > prevents upstream adding/changing the values in the .pc file yet > again for next release, this should be dynamic -- just like > $(get_udevdir), $(get_libdir) etc. Nothing is covered. If you change the installation dir for the completion modules, then eselect bashcomp won't be able to find them any more. So you need a transition plan. Ulrich
