-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 07/17/2013 04:57 PM, hasufell wrote: > I know there was an announcement about the upcoming change to > cmake-utils.eclass, however... it is not enough to give a deadline > without caring if people actually fixed it by then. > > By doing that you risk breaking stable packages which is not > trivial. > > You _must_ do a tinderbox run, test that stuff in an overlay or > whatever. You are responsible for ALL reverse deps. > > The way it was done... was not appropriate. Please be more careful > next time. There are still incoming bugs about broken base_src_* > calls. (see the tracker) >
I discussed this with hasufell on IRC, but I'll lay out the response on the list too. Yes, this was my fault. We (KDE team) tested in our overlay, but none of the packages there use the base_src_* calls, which is why it didn't come up in testing, and I did not realize that there were packages that did rely on the implicit base inherit to call base_src_* directly. Chris Reffett -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.20 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/ iKYEARECAGYFAlHnCfVfFIAAAAAALgAoaXNzdWVyLWZwckBub3RhdGlvbnMub3Bl bnBncC5maWZ0aGhvcnNlbWFuLm5ldEM2NzU5RjUyMDczREJDQkVDQTBDRkE1NERC Nzk1QThBNDI2MTgzNTQACgkQ23laikJhg1T6ZACcC5cDNBCODxrnzlPCTm+L4EgS wCkAniqjyBFXhIXeXyb0Wbvufkbw68yS =QM3o -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
