-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On 07/22/2013 12:33 AM, Michał Górny wrote:
> Dnia 2013-07-22, o godz. 00:16:31 hasufell <hasuf...@gentoo.org>
> napisał(a):
> 
>> On 07/22/2013 12:07 AM, Duncan wrote:
>>> hasufell posted on Sun, 21 Jul 2013 17:22:24 +0200 as
>>> excerpted:
>>> 
>>>> solution: Treeclean it and maintain it in an overlay (maybe 
>>>> science-overlay). That's exactly what overlays are for...
>>>> experimental stuff.
>>> 
>>> What's the pros/cons of overlay vs. in-tree-but-masked for
>>> something like this?  In-tree-but-masked is at least available
>>> for those who want it, without having to load an overlay, but I
>>> don't see that discussed at all, here.
>>> 
>> 
>> cons: - users have to run "layman -a foo" ...I hope they will
>> manage (and the masking reason will be updated to explain where
>> to look for googleearth ebuilds)
> 
> Then to get *a single package* they start using the whole overlay.
> If it's a sane overlay, fine. But some overlays really replace a
> lot of stuff silently and trigger failures we didn't even imagine
> before.
> 

No.

I'd either use a separate single-purpose overlay or add it to
science-overlay.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.20 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/

iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJR7GI8AAoJEFpvPKfnPDWzVrQH/3o8FrgSaCFpWEAJj1qeFpQP
/01wJzMsTV3YWZ9ZqvIZ7txPls+KBlV7hrm0SSNdP5SWO/tdXPllwNu7B+3rdcKN
UOP56hlGtRRT2xw1/M/EWX76+hQmMUSYncMJ5kwqWwWGiKYRgJqR6WYH99igxwSV
7OOewcdU9p56l1MY5TxyH0tG/7KkJADSmYCf6xIK7Lkz1yU9G/e2I1WQsMGVnIBR
TUkV+q1gM9zDwjKtK64X4rA4l2KiTDfoksyBgSelVMYNPcNEGYZgwmrXCJhKZK7B
dYONlBDp/9BG+ihhsNTAXewxsDuVPtXTdFX4dzLciXgGdFw81r+LoNFViH7pRVM=
=4JPG
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Reply via email to