On 07/22/2013 12:22 AM, Diego Elio Pettenò wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 21, 2013 at 11:16 PM, hasufell <hasuf...@gentoo.org> wrote:
> 
>> pros:
>> - consistency of tree quality
does not apply to p.mask'd packages

>> - less user confusion (the checksum failures alone get us a lot of bugs
>> every release without people realizing what it means...) and people
>> expect packages to work in the tree
maybe

>> - less bugs no one can do anything about
does not apply

>> - easier contribution of users in an overlay, testing of hacks or other
>> stuff to make it work
does not apply

>> - making clear that gentoo does not support software with such low QA
does not apply

>> - making clear that this software is experimental
applies

>>
> 
> Half of those apply also to p.mask'd packages as Duncan pointed out. Maybe
> even more than half.
> 
> 


Reply via email to