On 7/24/13 8:31 AM, Alex Alexander wrote: > On Wed, Jul 24, 2013 at 10:15:51AM -0400, Mike Gilbert wrote: >> Actually, Portage normally handles this situation gracefully by using >> the dependencies from the portage tree instead of vdb. However, in the >> case of a slot-operator dep, it always uses vdb. >> >> See bug 477544. >> >> https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=477544 > > Aha, thanks for the bug, missed it. Well, my recommendation is still > valid until portage gets fixed. Glad to know someone's looking into > it though.
Can we get that recommendation to the devmanual possibly? I'm still a little bit confused what exactly would warrant such a revision bump, and why. Paweł
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
