On 6/08/2013 02:13, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
On Tue, 06 Aug 2013 02:03:28 +1000
Michael Palimaka <[email protected]> wrote:
How often does this situation even come up? If 9/10 times the
libraries are set up as maintainers expect them to be, it is
probably better to deal with the odd unnecessary rebuild until
somebody spots it, rather than going without support for slot
operator deps.
With respect, "good enough" is not a very high standard to aim for.
In my opinion, adding unnecessary subslot dependencies is no
different to adding overly-wide dependencies.
There's a world of difference between a horrible breakage and an
occasional unnecessary compile. If users are concerned about how they
spend their CPU time, they're using the wrong distribution.
To which horrible breakage are you referring?
