>>>>> "TW" == Tom Wijsman <[email protected]> writes:
TW> Also, please just call it git-3.eclass as it is a major change; any TW> other form of naming will introduce confusion (eg. -r1 < -2), also we TW> probably shouldn't change git-2.eclass as even when masked it doesn't TW> seem like a good thing to break its current API and documentation as TW> well as what actually works in the Portage tree. +1 on all of that. git-3 is a better name than using -r1. And leave git-2 there for at /least/ a year. There are a LOT of out of tree git-2 users. -JimC -- James Cloos <[email protected]> OpenPGP: 1024D/ED7DAEA6
