On Mon, Oct 14, 2013 at 12:47:08PM -0400, Richard Yao wrote:

*snip*

> Both of which are correct. That being said, I am not against making
> changes, but given that this is on the list, I would like to someone to
> provide a technical justification. Some key questions that justification
> should answer are "what capability does this provide to sysytemd that
> cannot be obtained without this change? and "what does that do for
> users"? So far, the only thing that I have read is "systemd wants it",
> which answers neither question.

A quick google for per-process namespaces turns up this lwn series:

http://lwn.net/Articles/531114/

This functionality can't be fully supported if /etc/mtab is a file.

William

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Reply via email to