-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On 10/15/2013 07:29 PM, Vicente Olivert Riera wrote:
> Can't the users download and install those tables manually from the
> official ophcrack website/server? If so, maybe adding the instructions
> in the pkg_postinst() phase of app-crypt/ophcrack ebuild would be
> enough. In that case, it wouldn't make sense having
> app-crypt/ophcrack-tables in the portage tree and should be treecleaned.

I think this may be the sanest option *for the large tables*.  The small
tables are great, and you can einfo a message about the large ones.

- -Zero
> 
> **************************
> Vicente Olivert Riera
> Gentoo Linux Developer
> ID GnuPG: 5AE9E7B2E9BBCBA8
> **************************
> 
> On 10/16/2013 01:20 AM, Mike Auty wrote:
>> Hi there,
>>
>> I'm updating the app-crypt/ophcrack-tables package to include the new
>> tables available from their site.  These are basically just additional
>> data packages that can be useful with the app-crypt/ophcrack package,
>> but they're very large.  Including all of them will come just short of
>> 30Gb.  I don't know whether it's ok to add that to our mirrors, or add
>> RESTRICT="mirror"?
>>
>> Also, these take up a lot of space in distfiles.  Does anyone know of
>> a clever way to allow them to be installed without also stashing a
>> copy in distfiles (symlinking to the distfiles directory is a no go,
>> because each "set" needs its own files to have the same name as the
>> other sets)?
>>
>> I guess it's a bit of an infra question, but thought I'd ask here in
>> case anyone else has found themselves in a similar situation.  For
>> more specifics about what the package is like/for see the test ebuild
>> at [1]...
>>
>> Mike  5:)
>>
>> [1]
>> http://git.overlays.gentoo.org/gitweb/?p=dev/ikelos.git;a=blob;f=app-crypt/ophcrack-tables/ophcrack-tables-1.1.ebuild
>>
> 

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/

iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJSXertAAoJEKXdFCfdEflKICcP/2I+L61IWFk2Ackp+SqGgCHV
NKuqCAFeoGywXIIgoFI/eWrOfHBQwyNKrNL6lRcBcYQXJy96yR/caRSPS+zPsEoU
B4pJ13KJg0ipCriZUXHMtAOGcBOJRr40ItW0L3qT8ICl8TIFHeaDuqx5Sbl7GuHQ
Ewqt5CdN4g7lpp5XROmz/LKHr3fHi+KNMPj7GrKd/guoALqmJvclmyWmmrovzr91
1ueSPghfSF78AHjEj8X7H7702/waLeOpww2MZkXfAY+H3Chw2AuTR0JC7xiSpMvX
Dq4rtLUmdeobozBwNDkczoVGcfxoR+AguNlZUIz2Vij2A3XxVznqEYHY+VIbwZVm
o5ut+P58GJBBct5TSi1IMdq2Rfrg7xP16e757Ki1FDSbQamaDhl8SETPbPQ0YrjV
J9m8JQ2tlvgMi20Z+UA5QVWT9jZq8s8/26eDkeZNzYilmNZ8sSWUAlpNOgC0xsSG
n4RN1COEVcpyxhyFjjMLB+GjxVa14fCgpZ+mcd/VwRmxU7scnw8YweWALamnAEbB
FmcBB6tedeeA6TWcXtr3HGbfwt37KdHHo8xDJpJVl42dk08FKtV5sSY4vA2MDkL9
pyI4r4qo076KT9N4ZIsljPf3pGAYe3ERnIdNFgEci8UJBapoHh2GnLuTAN+EFjDt
GcEiQLGWWMK9TuVL/9Jj
=kOqk
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Reply via email to