Dnia 2013-11-16, o godz. 12:39:37 Martin Vaeth <[email protected]> napisał(a):
> Pacho Ramos <[email protected]> wrote: > > > >> > 3: multilib.eclass > >> > > > > > This is my preferred solution > > However, it has some serious drawbacks; most importantly: > It implies that the same USE-flags must be used for the > native and 32-bit variant. We are aware of that. However, there were no solution proposed that wouldn't make the things horribly complex. > A "cleaner" solution would somehow treat the 32bit and > 64bit variant like separate packages, each having its > own set of USE-Flags, and also the possibility to rebuild > one without rebuilding the other. AFAIK multilib-portage > can do this. Really? Last time I checked it didn't have that option. Unless you mean theoretically... -- Best regards, Michał Górny
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
