On Mon, 13 Jan 2014 18:21:58 +0000
Ciaran McCreesh <ciaran.mccre...@googlemail.com> wrote:

> On Mon, 13 Jan 2014 19:16:45 +0100
> Tom Wijsman <tom...@gentoo.org> wrote:
> > On Mon, 13 Jan 2014 08:49:17 -0800
> > Alec Warner <anta...@gentoo.org> wrote:
> > > The caching may not be of use, depending on your configuration.
> > > (For example, if you use a gentoo-x86 checkout as your main repo,
> > > you will probably want to run generate cache entries whenever you
> > > cvs up.) It is there to cache ebuild metadata, because if your
> > > depgraph has a few thousand nodes, having to spawn bash to
> > > generate the metadata for every node is very expensive.
> > 
> > It sounds crazy to use gentoo-x86 without a cache; to some extent,
> > the earlier mentions on this ML by Ciaran that we should improve
> > input would make more sense if would want to run without a cache.
> > But I feel like this shouldn't be a topic of discussion unless we
> > intent 'works fast on a plain CV checkout' to be an actual feature.
> 
> I think you're misunderstanding that comment. It's not just the file
> formats that are bad. It's also what data is provided. Two examples
> are the massive lengths we have to go to to figure out what to do
> with || dependencies (thanks to the horrific abuses commonly used in
> the tree...), and the well-documented REQUIRED_USE screwup.

Iotw, 'input'; but thank you for clarifying.

-- 
With kind regards,

Tom Wijsman (TomWij)
Gentoo Developer

E-mail address  : tom...@gentoo.org
GPG Public Key  : 6D34E57D
GPG Fingerprint : C165 AF18 AB4C 400B C3D2  ABF0 95B2 1FCD 6D34 E57D

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to