On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 4:33 AM, Patrick Lauer <[email protected]> wrote:

> Ahoi,
>
> I've been looking for a clean git-converted gentoo-x86 repo for ... well
> ... mostly data mining as cvs / anoncvs.g.o is too slow for some things.
>
> This has been needlessly challenging, which confuses me a bit.
>
> First, a little complaint:
>
> There used to be some data at git-exp.overlays.gentoo.org, but that
> machine has vanished. Ok, stuff happens, but that's not motivating.
>
> Anoncvs.g.o is bouncing up and down a lot, so just getting the raw cvs
> repo to do a local conversion is somewhere between needlessly hard and
> impossible.
>

As I had initially advised, you can rsync the entire CVS repo and do the
entire conversion locally using cvs pserver. You don't need to rely on
anoncvs. As you have noticed, it doesn't exactly have high marks for
uptime. Plus a local conversation is much faster; you don't get the network
latency for all the cvs operations.

-A


>
> The gentoo-scm mailinglist has mostly fallen asleep, but even the stuff
> discussed there doesn't seem to exist in a public repo that can be found
> without telepathy skills.
>
> So ... well ... if it's that hard to just find out the state of the last
> experiments there won't be much contribution.
>
> There is a git repository at https://bitbucket.org/lmnd/gentoo-x86 - but
> (1) it has truncated history and (2) it diverges by >1500 files from
> gentoo-x86 for the last week. So that's mostly useless for data mining.
> (I haven't tried figuring out how it diverges, but raw ebuild count is
> +1600 for "yesterday", so that's baad)
>
> I'd appreciate it if people that worked on the conversion would point me
> at the scripts and documentation they used; I'd appreciate a proper
> 'official' repo to collect such things; and it'd be really useful to
> have the work-in-progress converted repo online so that people can
> experiment with it.
>
> (If anyone needs webspace or similar for that, well, I run lots of cruft
> anyways, so another annoying thing won't matter ...)
>
> Thanks for your support,
>
> Patrick
>
> P.S. If anyone feels an overwhelming urge to point out the irony ...
> don't ;)
>
>

Reply via email to