On Sat, 22 Feb 2014 17:33:57 +0000 (UTC) Duncan <[email protected]> wrote:
> Tom Wijsman posted on Sat, 22 Feb 2014 18:08:24 +0100 as excerpted: > > >> That seems a little on the small side? Can we just do a single > >> category for all of it, instead? People can go bikeshed on the > >> name. > > > > TL;DR: Yes, we could try that; but what would be a consistent name? > > mate-desktop ? While still inconsistent with what already exists, that indeed sounds sane towards the user, +1; does someone object 'mate-desktop'? > (The mate-base and mate-extra split seems more consistent with the > rest of the tree to me, and around a dozen packages each seems fine, > but if it's to be a single category, mate-desktop seems reasonable. > Or desktop- mate, or mate-dt...) (Or do we want a consistent 'mate-base' / 'mate-extra' approach?) -- With kind regards, Tom Wijsman (TomWij) Gentoo Developer E-mail address : [email protected] GPG Public Key : 6D34E57D GPG Fingerprint : C165 AF18 AB4C 400B C3D2 ABF0 95B2 1FCD 6D34 E57D
