-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA512 Michał Górny: > Dnia 2014-02-24, o godz. 01:18:49 hasufell <[email protected]> > napisał(a): > >> But to make it more clear to you: I don't think that removing >> shallow clone support is an improvement, so I vote against >> removing it. > > Then please provide patches that add proper support for that. The > changes were necessary to fix repeatedly reported bugs/requests > while the shallow clone code conflicted with them. > > I will be happy to re-introduce them when I have time and proper > design. Complaining isn't going to help, you know. >
I might, but before working on something it has to be discussed first. I won't put effort into something without knowing if it's for nothing (e.g. maintainer disagreement or refusing patches because of coding style). So yes, complaining helps to make clear what we want. Every bug report is in fact a complaint. There is no rush from my side since I still use the old eclass. I was just confused of your way to move this through which did not make clear if you even think of reintroducing it since you said "I don't feel like maintaining the extra code is worth the effort" and did not respond to ulm's and my comment. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQEcBAEBCgAGBQJTC0NNAAoJEFpvPKfnPDWzckMH/37BCLThG/8Q9FubLneEF5OY ahwwGMqcj2cWNg4eR7tVAIEqlSn+kVg3BKYV+eIFA83Zi3BLR18O2HRaegKM4N/E IrzJLaACdYaZNJgRsi7I0WNcvUFlrYaCpq4xqf804J/r+7PCRngRnZS7uijG38jz LwwWyIzhVEkGo3S5MO4zgfXkZkkYPVhRoJqotMCslv+Lg13awgRwfadUfgzKRRZU If9QR0dzZRo5ZBI9mgtwSK3HqcxQtphX+tzxMGtiVJklN1th8ny0CdSjyXqS0M0B XttIOII/cX2xHxLbYJ+NC/XczrEzKLGIqZEmv5hKsVUolyTJ0rWM6qVLDdXiIlo= =vDC+ -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
