-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512

Ciaran McCreesh:
> On Fri, 28 Mar 2014 15:46:49 -0400 Wyatt Epp <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>> On Fri, Mar 28, 2014 at 1:14 PM, Ciaran McCreesh 
>> <[email protected]> wrote:
>>> On Thu, 27 Mar 2014 03:53:47 +0100 yac <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>> What I was describing is the difference between fundamental 
>>>> properties of categories and tags.
>>> 
>>> You are trying to redefine categories in terms of a concept
>>> that they didn't originally represent.
>> 
>> No one's redefining anything.  You seem awfully fixated on the
>> history that forced categories to exist, which doesn't really
>> matter in this context.  Regardless of any of that, people can
>> and _do_ attempt to use categories as a rudimentary method of
>> attempting to search for packages.
> 
> "Giving something a unique unambiguous name" is not a historical
> issue. It's something we still need, and a core part of how package
> manglers work. You can't just pretend that categories there for
> exactly this.
> 
>>> From a package mangler perspective, categories aren't just "a
>>> label" for a package. They're fundamentally part of a package's
>>> name.
>>> 
>> From that standpoint, they're even less adequate for lookup;
>> encoding metadata in names has never turned out well for anyone.
> 
> Things still need a unique unambiguous name. It's that or GUIDs...
> 

derailed.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

iQJ8BAEBCgBmBQJTNdltXxSAAAAAAC4AKGlzc3Vlci1mcHJAbm90YXRpb25zLm9w
ZW5wZ3AuZmlmdGhob3JzZW1hbi5uZXQzMDlCNDQ4NjEyNDI4NjA5REVEMDI3MzIy
MjBDRDFDNUJERUVEMDIwAAoJECIM0cW97tAgBeoP/A2f7vHUF3eueeeUsbr7tWIT
z9mURgUl7fKsH7ZQ3cHeEqtL4dDWKmM6XRXuCpRgLK7zMQ1AqFiZSoFOMHCgySs2
TWCpZpTEJQfX6KFbyxuF5Y8GUk8nj0UdfOoYRjOUxlqaNyTG95ZaTKTkTM11EbW1
ER7Tpwj7bJeuKEaHWesPF5zXkzPaZxgu8UDwTu6jYSr0KMpw6GeoEuHiL4lBoXNk
LbKWyt0tDIy4U74U1R68U8yFjwkmvUdIdF8khHO77B3/EDn8/V8fwETkkxhh3YZ3
UHTAZFT7/OKkz3XdycXpbbKUn0aPCSev4/W2QY77ZICL6E6NK1zFAWHIrYO+jJQu
jfP0/iZUpmZPpZbwofjbQgqa6jOtgfQdhP5AXQneApzocf74OoV/1/zbSHpyGIII
SiYb/CNrOU4TDDZo0/+8xcc1GFIBlELy4bpa+UwpGBGqF0KYrt9G1kwVK7YBvo1I
vpbQb/8wIF1HBg97JbbPsTPIYGcMMR7UZ/FcoKQoe5FQ6A6uyCqQRWqR8DYCRqoJ
6lOpsEwGcOnJzNOfAP2nmdE0ZOT0Fg+M4mBIdksNBb12i4MVi+q0BPTxxpS7wLnc
dlA2Ix97y3YPqzBIw9l0593e2abSjmdboIRu6I5duy8zJ/OE8YX8scOnNRZWYBSK
9HC8Mt4Hi1yJiv2oYeEA
=ygQ2
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Reply via email to