On 01/04/14 18:28, Tom Wijsman wrote: > On Tue, 01 Apr 2014 12:23:43 +0000 > hasufell <[email protected]> wrote: > >> And this is going to get worse if people don't trust them. Currently >> it looks more like a loose club, instead of a team with strong >> hierarchical structure, which is the only thing that enables a quick >> line of action if needed. And that is one of its purposes, afaiu. > There is a strong structure present; for policy enforcement and > breakage prevention, we have the ability to 1) act until there is
And let's be perfectly clear here, nothing was, or is broken. Futher, no policy was violated, none, whatsoever. This is an individual, albeit a QA member, disagreeing with a design model. If joining QA team means you get to dictate, alone, how others do their work, even when they are not breaking anything while doing so, without the rest of the team, we'd be setting a bad precedence. The QA membership is not a large trout you get to bash others with when you feel like it. Otherwise everyone would be lining up the QA team membership just to protect their work from others. - Samuli
