On Wed, Apr 2, 2014 at 4:27 PM, Rick "Zero_Chaos" Farina <[email protected]> wrote: > Honestly I'd rather see this split up into libbluetooth and bluez than > make it possible to build a nearly entirely crippled bluez with no udev > support.
I think the right approach really depends on usefulness. Splitting packages has its own set of issues. If it really made sense in the general case to install one without the other splitting would make managing dependencies a lot cleaner. However, if this is really so that 10 Gentoo users can avoid having udev installed just give them a flag and a warning and let them keep the pieces if they break their box. I mean, who is going to set USE=-udev globally and not expect that something could go wrong? Anybody who is going to set up busybox mdev isn't going to try to make that switch over their lunch break on a production box. Rich
