On 08/04/14 22:26, Pacho Ramos wrote: > El mar, 08-04-2014 a las 16:14 +0300, Samuli Suominen escribió: >> It would take considerably amount of time to start extracting tarballs, >> installing ebuilds, and reporting bugs about possible >> broken .png files within packages. >> The problem is broken IDAT lenght, an error that libpng15 still >> gracefully ignored, but libpng16 no longer ignores. >> >> The bug, http://bugs.gentoo.org/468386 >> List created by Tobias at 2013 May, >> https://bugs.gentoo.org/attachment.cgi?id=347306 >> <mailto:[email protected]> >> >> This has been discussed on the ML before, and most important packages >> got already fixed, but there are packages still >> left. Any help addressing the issue is welcome, and I'm sending this >> mail in hopes people will see packages on the lists >> that intrest them, and fix them. >> >> Thanks, >> Samuli >> <mailto:[email protected]> >> > If there exists a tool that detects that broken png files, maybe a QA > portage check (like the one used to detect broken .desktop files) could > be added to help to detect and fix the problematic images :/ > >
Pretty good idea, there is the script in python, and Portage is python, maybe it can be adopted somehow. The script is at, https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=466190#c11 - Samuli
![Re: [gentoo-dev] Some tarballs still ship broken .png images that can't be viewed with libpng16, "Tracker" bug #468386](/search?l=gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org&q=subject:%22Re%5C%3A+%5C%5Bgentoo%5C-dev%5C%5D+Some+tarballs+still+ship+broken+.png+images+that+can%27t+be+viewed+with+libpng16%2C+%5C%22Tracker%5C%22+bug+%23468386%22&o=newest){kind=link}
