On 30/06/14 18:16, Ian Stakenvicius wrote: > On 30/06/14 04:46 AM, Andreas K. Huettel wrote: > > > [snip!] * As Fabian pointed out, perl-core/Switch-2.160.0 should > > still go stable. Fine with me (but I can't read your minds about > > future stabilizations, and the virtual only had ~arch reverse > > deps). > > > There shouldn't be any need to read minds, here -- if the previous > stable perl had this capability, then the new stable perl should too
that's nonsense, if upstreams remove features, even working ones, it might not make everyone happy, but they are well within their rights to do that (like, upower dropping hibernate/suspend support) and if someone isn't happy about it, they can always fork - Samuli
