-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256

On 17/07/14 08:28 AM, Pacho Ramos wrote:
> I recently noticed this: 
> https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=502836
> 
> imlib2 ebuild can only be stabilized in one round for all arches
> as KEYWORDS are set in eclass depending on E_STATE="release". That
> has an important drawback as forces all arches to be done at the
> same time and, since some are much slower than others, forces all
> to wait for them. And, as that can depend on even more
> stabilizations (like it's the case) all that bugs blocking the
> stabilization need to also be done for *all* arches before.
> 
> I am not sure if any policy exists for this, but I would forbid to
> make this due this issue. I would instead move to use KEYWORDS en
> ebuild as done usually.
> 
> What do you think?
> 
> 

Unless there is some sort of need to synchronize stable keywords
across multiple packages in an identical fashion, that is -so
important- it can't be left to AT's and maintainers to ensure the
stablereq bugs are filed across them all at once on their own, I don't
see a reason for setting KEYWORDS in an eclass.

So, +1 for moving KEYWORDS to ebuilds.  I'm not sure if "forbidding"
is necessary, as I think strongly discouraging all overly-complicated
solutions like this one would suffice. (and yes i know the irony of
this statement given that I'm in the gx86-multilib project :)


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux)

iF4EAREIAAYFAlPH2RYACgkQ2ugaI38ACPCq3gD7B0Sf5QEs3PUSLfjIywP4HPp6
wkKHXP/i3/1N846wH8YA/0h+4yWByW6AmKS6ii+ZGwvy6W/HwowMnXOGOMPgtBux
=zS/0
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Reply via email to