Dnia 2014-07-26, o godz. 08:05:32 Duncan <1i5t5.dun...@cox.net> napisał(a):
> Ian Stakenvicius posted on Fri, 25 Jul 2014 14:49:44 -0400 as excerpted: > > > Hey all.. So, putting aside for now how much of a mess this would be to > > implement in the virtuals' ebuilds themselves, what do people think of > > changing the virtuals so that they contain an entry in IUSE for each > > provider that can satisfy it? > > > > The idea here is that the package satisfying a virtual could be > > optionally explicitly-chosen through package.use (or USE= in make.conf, > > perhaps) instead of having an entry in @world, that way if nothing > > depends on the virtual then it and the provider can be - --depclean'ed > > from the system. The idea is specifically NOT to have rdeps depend on > > these flags, that would undermine the whole purpose of the virtual; it > > would just be for end-users to set if they so chose. > > > > This may also help with getting portage to peg a virtual's provider to a > > specific package instead of constantly trying to switch from one to > > another, ie, how systemd kept getting pulled in, in relation to the > > upower virtual. > > What about handling each such virtual_USE as a USE_EXPAND? VIRTUAL_* as > reserved-namespace USE_EXPAND would give us full backward compatibility > along with an immediately identifiable namespace and virtually (heh) no > possibility of confusion with other configuration. USE_EXPAND are global by definition. We ought fight with the abuse of USE_EXPAND rather than make another abuse legitimate. Especially that you're going to increase a lot of new variables quickly for no really good reason. -- Best regards, Michał Górny
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
